Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These National Academies Of Sciences results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 28.6% saturation with 336 hits. Analysis detected 2,611 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,173 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This National Academies Of Sciences is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
National Academies Of Sciences
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 1,173
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 24.7%24.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 28.6%28.6%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 16.7%16.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 16.4%16.4%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 10.5%10.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.3%10.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 14.5%14.5%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Keyword 9.3%9.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.6%9.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 6.2%6.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 28.6%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Keyword 16.4%, sitewide 26.9%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 24.7%, sitewide 4.6%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 16.7%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 14.5%, sitewide 7.5%False Dilemma: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 2.7%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 8.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.3%Circular Reasoning: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos