Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 2,167 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nathan Lane results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Self-Serving Bias , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 5.5% saturation with 359 hits . Analysis detected 3,589 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,501 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 11% (33,594 of 37,536 keywords). This Nathan Lane is better (less manipulative) than 89.50% of the peer group. Nathan Lane
Keyword details
Total words: 6,501
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.5% percentile 1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst