Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,967 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Must Love Dogs results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Optimism Bias , and Anecdotal , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 976 hits . Analysis detected 7,373 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,430 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 61% (14,748 of 37,536 keywords). This Must Love Dogs is worse (more manipulative) than 60.70% of the peer group. Must Love Dogs
Keyword details
Total words: 6,430
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
61% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.7% percentile 3.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 15.2% 15.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 10.5% 10.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 8.7% 8.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 15.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 15.2%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 6.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst