Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video940 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Murray School District results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 36.6% saturation with 1,031 hits. Analysis detected 5,695 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,820 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.7% and a BS Rank of 89% (4,154 of 37,536 keywords). This Murray School District is worse (more manipulative) than 88.90% of the peer group.
Murray School District
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
89%Murray School District (selected)7%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,820
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

89% percentile
025507510088.9% percentile
6.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 36.6%36.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 16.1%16.1%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 8.1%8.1%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Keyword 8.2%8.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 21.1%21.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 7.3%7.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.3%6.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 9.9%9.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 15.0%15.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 4.4%4.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 36.6%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Keyword 21.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.0%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 16.1%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 8.1%Bandwagon: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 2.0%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 1.9%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 5.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos