Keyword summary
86%1 analyzed article/video876 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Muira Mccammon results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Negativity Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.2% saturation with 426 hits. Analysis detected 3,363 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,628 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of 77% (8,372 of 35,131 keywords). This Muira Mccammon is worse (more manipulative) than 76.20% of the peer group.
Muira Mccammon
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
77%Muira Mccammon (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,628
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

76% percentile
025507510076.2% percentile
4.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 16.2%16.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 15.8%15.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 13.4%13.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 7.4%7.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 7.0%7.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 13.4%13.4%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 6.8%6.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 16.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 15.8%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.4%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 2.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.5%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.7%Tu Quoque: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.2%Straw Man: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Indoctrination: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos