Keyword summary
18% 1 analyzed article/video 163 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Muahs Awards results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Anecdotal , and Hindsight Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 96 hits . Analysis detected 319 faulty-reasoning hits from 652 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.4% and a BS Rank of 84% (6,349 of 37,536 keywords). This Muahs Awards is worse (more manipulative) than 83.10% of the peer group. Muahs Awards
Keyword details
Total words: 652
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
83% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 83.1% percentile 5.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles652 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 14.7% 14.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 14.7%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 5.2% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 1.4% Indoctrination: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst