Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 365 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mr Nobody Against Putin results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 16.7% saturation with 183 hits . Analysis detected 1,321 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,095 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of 81% (7,405 of 37,536 keywords). This Mr Nobody Against Putin is worse (more manipulative) than 80.30% of the peer group. Mr Nobody Against Putin
Keyword details
Total words: 1,095
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
80% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 80.3% percentile 5.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 12.3% 12.3% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 8.4% 8.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.2% 12.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 8.7% 8.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 16.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 0.0% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 6.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 0.8% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.0% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.6% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst