Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video449 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Moscow Tehran Alliance results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 68.4% saturation with 921 hits. Analysis detected 3,519 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,347 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 11.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠97% (1,343 of 37,536 keywords). This Moscow Tehran Alliance is worse (more manipulative) than 96.40% of the peer group.
Moscow Tehran Alliance
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠97%Moscow Tehran Alliance (selected)12%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,347
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

96% percentile
025507510096.4% percentile
11.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 68.4%68.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 29.6%29.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 21.8%21.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 12.3%12.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 11.4%11.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 13.1%13.1%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Keyword 7.7%7.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 7.3%7.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 7.3%7.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 8.9%8.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Keyword 68.4%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 29.6%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 21.8%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Keyword 20.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 16.6%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Keyword 13.1%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 4.6%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 8.1%Slippery Slope: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 1.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos