Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 497 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Montreal Canadiens Playoffs results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Recency Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.1% saturation with 459 hits . Analysis detected 1,178 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,988 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of 80% (7,645 of 37,536 keywords). This Montreal Canadiens Playoffs is worse (more manipulative) than 79.60% of the peer group. Montreal Canadiens Playoffs
Keyword details
Total words: 1,988
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
80% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 79.6% percentile 4.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.6% 10.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 23.1% 23.1% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 7.6% 7.6% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 23.1%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 5.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 2.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.8% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst