Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,981 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Monica Garcia results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Framing Effect , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 676 hits . Analysis detected 3,608 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,924 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 12% (33,095 of 37,536 keywords). This Monica Garcia is better (less manipulative) than 88.20% of the peer group. Monica Garcia
Keyword details
Total words: 7,924
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.8% percentile 1.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.5% 8.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst