Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Monaco Grand Prix results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Optimism Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 25.1% saturation with 773 hits . Analysis detected 2,541 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,076 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,530 keywords). This Monaco Grand Prix is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Monaco Grand Prix
Keyword details
Total words: 3,076
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 25.1% 25.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.9% 7.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 25.1%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.0% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.4% Indoctrination: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst