Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video762 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mohammed Hamdan Al Zaabi results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.6% saturation with 659 hits. Analysis detected 2,861 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,048 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (10,660 of 37,530 keywords). This Mohammed Hamdan Al Zaabi is worse (more manipulative) than 71.60% of the peer group.
Mohammed Hamdan Al Zaabi
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 3,048
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

72% percentile
025507510071.6% percentile
4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 16.1%16.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Keyword 5.1%5.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.3%3.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 21.6%21.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 21.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 16.1%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.1%Red Herring: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.7%Special Pleading: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.3%Blind-Spot Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos