Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Missouri Western District Court Of Appeals results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 5.6% saturation with 84 hits. Analysis detected 335 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,508 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Missouri Western District Court Of Appeals is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Missouri Western District Court Of Appeals
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 1,508
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Keyword 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.4%Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos