Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,275 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Missouri Special Legislative Session results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Straw Man, Appeal to Emotion, and In-Group Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.6% saturation with 252 hits. Analysis detected 1,782 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,825 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 23% (27,523 of 35,445 keywords). This Missouri Special Legislative Session is better (less manipulative) than 77.60% of the peer group.
Missouri Special Legislative Session
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
23%Missouri Special Legislative Session (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,825
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

22% percentile
025507510022.4% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.6%6.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Keyword 4.5%4.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Straw Man: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 0.9%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.4%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.5%Circular Reasoning: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.4%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos