Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,247 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Missouri General Assembly Session results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 362 hits. Analysis detected 3,470 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,988 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 29% (25,448 of 35,444 keywords). This Missouri General Assembly Session is better (less manipulative) than 71.80% of the peer group.
Missouri General Assembly Session
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
29%Missouri General Assembly Session (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,988
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

28% percentile
025507510028.2% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.3%7.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.9%1.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.0%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos