Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,429 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Missouri General Assembly results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , In-Group Bias , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 762 hits . Analysis detected 5,037 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,888 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 26% (27,941 of 37,536 keywords). This Missouri General Assembly is better (less manipulative) than 74.40% of the peer group. Missouri General Assembly
Keyword details
Total words: 6,888
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.6% percentile 2.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 11.1% 11.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst