Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,938 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Missouri Economic Development results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Optimism Bias, and Bandwagon, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19% saturation with 1,104 hits. Analysis detected 7,240 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,812 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (12,841 of 37,536 keywords). This Missouri Economic Development is worse (more manipulative) than 65.80% of the peer group.
Missouri Economic Development
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 5,812
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

66% percentile
025507510065.8% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 14.9%14.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.8%8.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 13.0%13.0%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Keyword 9.1%9.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.0%4.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 14.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 19.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 13.0%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Bandwagon: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Loss Aversion: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 2.5%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos