Keyword summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,868 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Missouri Department Of Conservation results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Hasty Generalization, and Halo Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 5.2% saturation with 386 hits. Analysis detected 2,925 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,472 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠2% (36,863 of 37,536 keywords). This Missouri Department Of Conservation is better (less manipulative) than 98.20% of the peer group.
Missouri Department Of Conservation
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 7,472
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

2% percentile
02550751001.8% percentile
1.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.4%1.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos