Keyword summary
19%1 analyzed article/video2,002 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Miriam R Nemeth results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Halo Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 611 hits. Analysis detected 4,033 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,008 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 7% (35,031 of 37,536 keywords). This Miriam R Nemeth is better (less manipulative) than 93.30% of the peer group.
Miriam R Nemeth
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
7%Miriam R Nemeth (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 8,008
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

7% percentile
02550751006.7% percentile
1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.6%7.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.3%1.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos