Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 842 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Miranda's Rescue results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Self-Serving Bias , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 365 hits . Analysis detected 2,540 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,368 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 35% (24,671 of 37,536 keywords). This Miranda's Rescue is better (less manipulative) than 65.70% of the peer group. Miranda's Rescue
Keyword details
Total words: 3,368
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.3% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.1% 8.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 3.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Tu Quoque: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.2% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.4% Special Pleading: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.3% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst