Keyword summary
64% 1 analyzed article/video 951 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Minnesota Wildfires results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Quote-first Misdirection , and Pessimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 303 hits . Analysis detected 1,802 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,853 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 39% (23,084 of 37,536 keywords). This Minnesota Wildfires is better (less manipulative) than 61.50% of the peer group. Minnesota Wildfires
Keyword details
Total words: 2,853
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.5% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.6% 10.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 6.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Tu Quoque: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst