Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,102 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Minnesota Timberwolves results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , and Halo Effect , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 479 hits . Analysis detected 3,806 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,890 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 53% (16,961 of 35,444 keywords). This Minnesota Timberwolves is worse (more manipulative) than 52.10% of the peer group. Minnesota Timberwolves
Keyword details
Total words: 3,890
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 52.1% percentile 3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 12.3% 12.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 10.6% 10.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 11.7% 11.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 4.6% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 0.5% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% Recency Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 2.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst