Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Minnesota Lawmaker Shooting results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Halo Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 206 hits. Analysis detected 529 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,380 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Minnesota Lawmaker Shooting is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Minnesota Lawmaker Shooting
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 2,380
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.7%8.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Keyword 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos