Keyword summary
22% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,453 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Minneapolis Police results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 691 hits . Analysis detected 4,030 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,459 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 31% (26,162 of 37,536 keywords). This Minneapolis Police is better (less manipulative) than 69.70% of the peer group. Minneapolis Police
Keyword details
Total words: 5,459
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.3% percentile 2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.7% 12.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.4% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst