Keyword summary
48% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,334 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Military Drones results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 1,911 hits . Analysis detected 12,908 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,917 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 39% (22,966 of 37,536 keywords). This Military Drones is better (less manipulative) than 61.20% of the peer group. Military Drones
Keyword details
Total words: 13,917
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.8% percentile 2.4% BS Score4 analyzed articles13.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 10.4% 10.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 13.7% 13.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 13.7%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 11.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst