Keyword summary
26% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,272 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mikel Merino results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Recency Bias , and Anchoring Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.1% saturation with 1,232 hits . Analysis detected 4,384 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,762 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 16% (31,876 of 37,536 keywords). This Mikel Merino is better (less manipulative) than 84.90% of the peer group. Mikel Merino
Keyword details
Total words: 8,762
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.1% percentile 1.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 14.1% 14.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 14.1%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 2.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.1% Horn Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst