Keyword summary
ā 30% 1 analyzed article/video 648 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mike Borgonzi results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Overconfidence Bias , and False Dilemma , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 4.8% saturation with 124 hits . Analysis detected 1,113 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,592 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ā 33% (37,988 of 56,290 keywords). This Mike Borgonzi is better (less manipulative) than 67.50% of the peer group. Mike Borgonzi
Keyword details
Total words: 2,592
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.5% percentile 1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.4% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.3% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst