Keyword summary
31% 1 analyzed article/video 645 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Midnight Circus results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Optimism Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 316 hits . Analysis detected 1,303 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,580 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 35% (23,917 of 36,518 keywords). This Midnight Circus is better (less manipulative) than 65.50% of the peer group. Midnight Circus
Keyword details
Total words: 2,580
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.5% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 12.3% 12.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.0% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst