Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video372 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Microlenses results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 154 hits. Analysis detected 1,250 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,488 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 61% (13,899 of 34,985 keywords). This Microlenses is worse (more manipulative) than 60.30% of the peer group.
Microlenses
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
61%Microlenses (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,488
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

60% percentile
025507510060.3% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.7%8.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.4%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos