Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,235 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michigan State Spartans results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 26.2% saturation with 1,295 hits . Analysis detected 7,623 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,940 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 58% (15,035 of 35,692 keywords). This Michigan State Spartans is worse (more manipulative) than 57.90% of the peer group. Michigan State Spartans
Keyword details
Total words: 4,940
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
58% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.9% percentile 3.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 26.2% 26.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.0% 13.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 26.2%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 13.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 6.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 1.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 3.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst