Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 636 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Mulgrew results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Self-Serving Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 305 hits . Analysis detected 1,735 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,544 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 47% (18,565 of 34,417 keywords). This Michael Mulgrew is better (less manipulative) than 53.90% of the peer group. Michael Mulgrew
Keyword details
Total words: 2,544
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
46% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.1% percentile 2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 12.0% 12.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.0% 9.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 12.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.0% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst