Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,565 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Landon results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 1,387 hits. Analysis detected 8,316 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,256 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 14% (29,869 of 34,626 keywords). This Michael Landon is better (less manipulative) than 86.30% of the peer group.
Michael Landon
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
14%Michael Landon (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 12,256
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

14% percentile
025507510013.7% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles12.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.3%11.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos