Keyword summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 6,737 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Govan results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Halo Effect , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 2,575 hits . Analysis detected 24,026 faulty-reasoning hits from 26,948 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (29,811 of 37,536 keywords). This Michael Govan is better (less manipulative) than 79.40% of the peer group. Michael Govan
Keyword details
Total words: 26,948
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.6% percentile 1.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles26.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 9.6% 9.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst