Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,008 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Farrell results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Halo Effect, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 6.3% saturation with 457 hits. Analysis detected 5,414 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,200 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (30,007 of 37,533 keywords). This Michael Farrell is better (less manipulative) than 79.90% of the peer group.
Michael Farrell
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
21%Michael Farrell (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 7,200
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

20% percentile
025507510020.1% percentile
1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.1%4.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.9%0.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos