Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video947 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Coren results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Halo Effect, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 298 hits. Analysis detected 3,314 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,788 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 28% (27,258 of 37,536 keywords). This Michael Coren is better (less manipulative) than 72.60% of the peer group.
Michael Coren
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
28%Michael Coren (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,788
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

27% percentile
025507510027.4% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.3%7.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.0%7.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.7%3.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos