Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video973 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Atkinson results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 24.3% saturation with 945 hits. Analysis detected 6,399 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,892 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.5% and a BS Rank of 84% (6,241 of 37,536 keywords). This Michael Atkinson is worse (more manipulative) than 83.40% of the peer group.
Michael Atkinson
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
84%Michael Atkinson (selected)6%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,892
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

83% percentile
025507510083.4% percentile
5.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 24.3%24.3%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 22.5%22.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.0%8.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 21.8%21.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.4%9.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Keyword 6.2%6.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 24.3%, sitewide 1.4%Ad Hominem: Keyword 22.5%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 21.8%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 13.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 6.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 1.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 3.1%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Straw Man: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos