Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos852 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Miami Hurricanes results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, In-Group Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 28.6% saturation with 899 hits. Analysis detected 5,852 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,148 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 77% (8,857 of 37,536 keywords). This Miami Hurricanes is worse (more manipulative) than 76.40% of the peer group.
Miami Hurricanes
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
77%Miami Hurricanes (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,148
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

76% percentile
025507510076.4% percentile
4.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 28.6%28.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 11.0%11.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 13.6%13.6%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 8.7%8.7%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Keyword 7.9%7.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.8%1.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 28.6%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 19.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Keyword 13.6%, sitewide 6.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 2.7%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 3.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 0.0%Straw Man: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 0.9%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos