Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,516 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Methane Emissions results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Appeal to Authority , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16% saturation with 729 hits . Analysis detected 5,990 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,548 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 60% (15,253 of 37,536 keywords). This Methane Emissions is worse (more manipulative) than 59.40% of the peer group. Methane Emissions
Keyword details
Total words: 4,548
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
59% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 59.4% percentile 3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.6% 7.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 12.6% 12.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 11.7% 11.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 16.0% 16.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 15.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.3% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst