Keyword summary
60% 1 analyzed article/video 749 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mercedes results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 300 hits . Analysis detected 1,382 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,247 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 45% (20,683 of 37,536 keywords). This Mercedes is better (less manipulative) than 55.10% of the peer group. Mercedes
Keyword details
Total words: 2,247
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
45% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.9% percentile 2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 13.3% 13.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 19.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.5% Personal Incredulity: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst