Keyword summary
26% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,312 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Megafauna results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Halo Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 699 hits . Analysis detected 5,383 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,521 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 39% (23,072 of 37,533 keywords). This Megafauna is better (less manipulative) than 61.50% of the peer group. Megafauna
Keyword details
Total words: 8,521
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.5% percentile 2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst