Keyword summary
⁠48%1 analyzed article/video1,389 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mega Masters Hearings results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 434 hits. Analysis detected 3,545 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,167 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (23,070 of 37,536 keywords). This Mega Masters Hearings is better (less manipulative) than 61.50% of the peer group.
Mega Masters Hearings
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠39%Mega Masters Hearings (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,167
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

39% percentile
025507510038.5% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.8%7.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.4%10.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.4%0.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos