Keyword summary
58% 1 analyzed article/video 1,444 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Medoc results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Quote-first Misdirection , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Nature as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 501 hits . Analysis detected 4,842 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,776 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 38% (23,427 of 37,536 keywords). This Medoc is better (less manipulative) than 62.40% of the peer group. Medoc
Keyword details
Total words: 5,776
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.6% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Nature Sitewide 0.2% Keyword 8.7% 8.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 0.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 6.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst