Keyword summary
97% 1 analyzed article/video 906 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Medical Sharps results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , Indoctrination , and Halo Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 17.7% saturation with 480 hits . Analysis detected 3,696 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,718 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 68% (11,708 of 35,635 keywords). This Medical Sharps is worse (more manipulative) than 67.10% of the peer group. Medical Sharps
Keyword details
Total words: 2,718
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 67.1% percentile 3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 11.6% 11.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 9.9% 9.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 17.7%, sitewide 15.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 1.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Bandwagon: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 3.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.5% Straw Man: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst