Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 542 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Medi Cal Funding results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Slippery Slope , and Begging the Question , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 21.7% saturation with 471 hits . Analysis detected 2,425 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,168 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 63% (13,872 of 37,536 keywords). This Medi Cal Funding is worse (more manipulative) than 63.00% of the peer group. Medi Cal Funding
Keyword details
Total words: 2,168
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
63% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.0% percentile 3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Keyword 9.2% 9.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 21.7% 21.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 21.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 15.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Slippery Slope: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 1.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% Begging the Question: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 1.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst