Keyword summary
41% 1 analyzed article/video 937 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maxxeapolis Goes To Hell results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Optimism Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 558 hits . Analysis detected 1,388 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,748 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 29% (41,059 of 57,762 keywords). This Maxxeapolis Goes To Hell is better (less manipulative) than 71.10% of the peer group. Maxxeapolis Goes To Hell
Keyword details
Total words: 3,748
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.9% percentile 1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 14.9% 14.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 15.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 14.9%, sitewide 0.5% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Red Herring: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.7% Circular Reasoning: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.0% Indoctrination: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst