Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 311 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matt Strawn results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Optimism Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 49.1% saturation with 458 hits . Analysis detected 3,066 faulty-reasoning hits from 933 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 13.7% and a BS Rank of 98% (973 of 37,536 keywords). This Matt Strawn is worse (more manipulative) than 97.40% of the peer group. Matt Strawn
Keyword details
Total words: 933
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
97% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 97.4% percentile 13.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles933 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 39.7% 39.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 36.3% 36.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 33.1% 33.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 49.1% 49.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 21.9% 21.9% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 16.2% 16.2% Red Herring Sitewide 0.7% Keyword 11.9% 11.9% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 13.1% 13.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 21.1% 21.1% Gambler’s Fallacy Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 9.0% 9.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Framing Effect: Keyword 49.1%, sitewide 26.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 39.7%, sitewide 4.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 36.3%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 33.1%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 24.0%, sitewide 15.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 21.9%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 21.1%, sitewide 11.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 16.2%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 13.1%, sitewide 1.9% Red Herring: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 0.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 3.7% Gambler’s Fallacy: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 0.0% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Blind-Spot Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Begging the Question: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.8% Personal Incredulity: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.2% Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst