Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 679 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matt Segal results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.3% saturation with 474 hits . Analysis detected 1,362 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,037 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 64% (13,723 of 37,536 keywords). This Matt Segal is worse (more manipulative) than 63.40% of the peer group. Matt Segal
Keyword details
Total words: 2,037
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
63% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.4% percentile 3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 23.3% 23.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 9.0% 9.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 23.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst