Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 3,364 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matt Little results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Halo Effect , and Ad Hominem , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 6.8% saturation with 918 hits . Analysis detected 9,682 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,456 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 10% (31,908 of 35,444 keywords). This Matt Little is better (less manipulative) than 90.00% of the peer group. Matt Little
Keyword details
Total words: 13,456
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.0% percentile 1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles13.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 3.7% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst