Keyword summary
86%1 analyzed article/video683 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matt Gorman results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and False Dilemma, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.1% saturation with 269 hits. Analysis detected 1,591 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,049 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 53% (16,954 of 35,887 keywords). This Matt Gorman is worse (more manipulative) than 52.80% of the peer group.
Matt Gorman
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
53%Matt Gorman (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,049
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

53% percentile
025507510052.8% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 13.1%13.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.9%5.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 13.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.4%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.4%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos