Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Massachusetts Election results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 433 hits . Analysis detected 3,730 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,182 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Massachusetts Election is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Massachusetts Election
Keyword details
Total words: 4,182
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 1.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst